
Overview
OVI Process & Charges in Ohio
OVI cases are often misunderstood because people assume everything turns on a single moment. A traffic stop. A test. A number.
That is not how these cases actually work.
In Ohio, an OVI charge unfolds through a defined legal process, governed by overlapping rules, timelines, and consequences. Understanding that process matters because many of the most important outcomes in an OVI case are decided before a judge ever determines guilt or innocence.
This page explains how OVI charges are structured and how cases move through the system, from the initial stop through resolution.
OVI Cases Move Through Two Separate Systems
Every OVI case involves two parallel tracks. They operate independently, intersect at specific points, and are governed by different authorities.
Administrative Consequences
Certain consequences begin immediately after an arrest, regardless of whether the State ultimately proves an OVI offense.
This includes administrative license suspensions imposed through the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. These suspensions are not criminal penalties. They are administrative actions with their own rules, timelines, and remedies.
Because this process runs separately from the court case, it is possible to experience significant restrictions without any finding of guilt.
You can learn more about how this works on the page covering license suspension and administrative penalties.
Criminal Charges
The criminal case determines whether the State can meet its burden of proof.
This process includes formal charging, court appearances, evidence review, legal motions, and eventual resolution. Unlike the administrative side, criminal consequences depend on what the State can prove and what defenses are available.
How the case is charged, how evidence is handled, and how procedural rules are enforced all affect the outcome.
How OVI Charges Are Classified
Ohio law treats OVI offenses differently depending on prior history, alleged conduct, and statutory thresholds.
Some cases are charged as first-time offenses, while others are elevated based on prior convictions or specific aggravating factors. Certain cases are charged as felonies, which dramatically changes exposure and long-term consequences.
These distinctions are not cosmetic. They affect:
-
Potential penalties
-
Mandatory minimums
-
License consequences
-
Court discretion
Separate pages address how first-time OVI charges differ from felony OVI cases, and why that distinction matters.
The Court Process
Once charges are filed, OVI cases move through a structured court process.
This typically includes:
-
Arraignment
-
Pretrial litigation
-
Evidence challenges
-
Negotiation or trial
Each stage presents opportunities to challenge the State’s case, enforce constitutional protections, and limit consequences. Skipping steps or treating the process as automatic removes those opportunities.
Pages addressing arraignment, pretrial procedure, and sentencing explain how each stage fits into the larger case.
Why Process Matters in OVI Defense
OVI law is technical by design. Deadlines matter. Procedures matter. Classifications matter.
A strong defense does not focus on a single moment in isolation. It evaluates the case as a system and looks for where the State failed to follow its own rules.
This page is intended to give you a framework for understanding that system. From here, each subpage addresses a specific part of the process in more detail.








