
OVI Traffic Stops
OVI Traffic Stops in Ohio
Every OVI case starts the same way. A traffic stop.
That moment matters more than most people realize. Long before field sobriety tests or breath tests enter the picture, the legality of the stop itself shapes everything that comes after.
Some stops are clean. Many are not. And the difference can change the entire case.
Why the Stop Matters
Police officers are not allowed to stop a vehicle just because they have a hunch. They must have a legally valid reason to initiate the stop. That reason has to exist before the lights come on.
If the stop is not lawful, everything that follows can be challenged. That includes observations, field sobriety tests, chemical tests, and even statements made by the driver.
This is not a technicality. It is a constitutional requirement. And it matters.
What Officers Are Looking For
Traffic stops in OVI cases often begin with minor driving behavior. Lane movement. Speed variation. A wide turn. A delayed stop.
Some of these observations are meaningful. Others are common, harmless, or taken out of context. The problem is not that officers observe. It is how those observations are later framed.
Once an officer believes impairment may be present, the stop often shifts quickly from traffic enforcement to investigation. That transition is where many cases begin to unravel.
Questions, Statements, and the Early Narrative
After the stop, officers typically ask questions. Where are you coming from. Have you been drinking. How much. When.
This is where the story of the case starts forming. Not in court. Not in reports. On the side of the road.
What a driver says, how they say it, and how those statements are later summarized can carry more weight than people expect. Silence is often misunderstood. Talking feels cooperative. But cooperation and self-protection are not always the same thing.
We address this more directly in the OVI Pocket Guide.
How Traffic Stops Connect to Field Sobriety Tests
Field sobriety tests do not exist in isolation. They are typically justified based on what an officer claims to have observed during the stop.
If the stop is weak, the justification for testing may be weak. If the officer’s observations are inconsistent or overstated, that matters later when those tests are evaluated.
Understanding the stop helps frame how field sobriety testing is viewed, which is why these issues cannot be separated. We break down the tests themselves in the Field Sobriety Tests section.
The Big Picture
Traffic stops are not just procedural steps. They are the foundation of the case.
A careful review looks at why the stop happened, whether it was lawful, how the interaction unfolded, and whether the conclusions drawn afterward actually follow from what occurred.
That kind of review often changes the direction of a case early.
Talking Through What Happened
Most people leave a traffic stop focused on what happened next. The tests. The arrest. The charges.
But the stop itself deserves attention.
A conversation allows us to walk through the initial encounter, identify what matters and what does not, and explain how that moment fits into the larger case. Clear context makes better decisions possible.
If you want to understand how your stop fits into your OVI case, that is where we start.








