top of page
American Courtroom
Black and White Minimalist Elegant Monogram Email Signature (200 x 100 px) (Email Header)-
Black and White Minimalist Elegant Monogram Email Signature (200 x 100 px) (Email Header)-
Black and White Minimalist Elegant Monogram Email Signature (200 x 100 px) (Email Header)-

How Criminal

Charges Begin

Charges Begin

Criminal Charges usually do not begin with proof.


They begin with a decision.

​

That decision is made by law enforcement or a prosecutor based on an allegation and whatever information exists at the time. It often happens quickly. It almost always happens before evidence has been tested in court.

​

Understanding how charges begin matters because the earliest steps of a case shape everything that follows. Evidence is gathered early. Narratives are set early. Mistakes made early are often difficult to undo later.

Charges Start With Allegations, Not Conclusions

A criminal case does not start because guilt has been established. It starts because someone claims that a crime occurred and the government decides to act on that claim.

​

The source of an allegation can vary. Sometimes it comes from a complaining witness. Sometimes it comes from an officer’s observation. Sometimes it comes from a third party report or a referral from another agency.

​

At this stage, no judge has weighed credibility. No evidence has been cross-examined. The state’s burden of proof has not yet been tested. The system is reacting to information, not resolving truth.

​

This distinction is often misunderstood outside the courtroom.

Police Investigations Shape the Case Before Charges Are Filed

Most criminal charges are built on police investigations. Those investigations are not neutral fact-finding exercises.

​

Officers decide what to pursue, what to document, and what to leave out. They decide which witnesses to speak with and how to summarize those conversations. They decide how events are framed in reports that prosecutors and judges will later rely on.

​

Reports are written after the fact. They reflect memory, interpretation, and assumptions. Video footage may exist, but it is often reviewed selectively. Physical evidence may be collected without context.

​

Once an investigation is reduced to paper, it becomes the starting point for the rest of the case. Challenging that foundation later requires time, records, and careful comparison to objective evidence.

​

This is why early defense review matters.

Prosecutors Decide Whether Charges Move Forward

Police do not always decide which charges are filed. Prosecutors ultimately determine whether a case proceeds and what offenses are alleged.

 

That decision is usually based on police reports, witness statements, and charging standards. Prosecutors do not test evidence at this stage. They assess whether charges can be supported on paper.

​

Probable cause is the standard. It is a low threshold.

​

If probable cause appears to exist, charges are filed. The case moves forward. The burden of proof still has not been met. That comes later, if at all.

Charges Can Be Filed Without an Arrest

Not all criminal charges begin with an arrest.

​

In many cases, charges are filed by summons. In others, a warrant issues after a review of paperwork. Grand jury indictments may be based entirely on one-sided presentations.

​

This surprises many people. The absence of an arrest does not mean the case is weak. The presence of an arrest does not mean the case is strong.

​

What matters is how the evidence was gathered and whether legal limits were respected.

Early Decisions Affect Evidence and Leverage

Once charges are filed, the case enters the formal criminal process. But leverage is often established long before that point.

​

Evidence may already be incomplete. Video may already be missing. Statements may already be locked into reports that do not match objective footage.

 

Defensive options narrow as time passes. Suppression issues depend on what happened at the beginning. Negotiation positions depend on what the state believes it can prove.

​

This is why criminal defense is not reactive. It is structured. It focuses on how the case started, not just how it ends.

Where Rights Are Most Often Overlooked

Constitutional rights apply at the beginning of a case, not just in court.

 

Stops must be justified. Searches must be lawful. Statements must be voluntary. Force must be reasonable. Probable cause must actually exist.

​

When those limits are crossed, evidence can be excluded. Cases can weaken. Some cases fail entirely.

​

These issues are often invisible to people experiencing the system for the first time. They are not invisible to defense attorneys reviewing how charges began.

​

You can learn more about these protections on the Your Rights Overview page.

Practical Takeaway

Criminal charges begin with decisions made early and often quickly. Those decisions are based on allegations, investigations, and paperwork, not proof.

​

How a case starts often determines how it ends.

​

Understanding that process is essential to understanding criminal defense.

bottom of page